Kids And The Cafeteria: Who Makes The Rules?
I have to tell you that having a website about health and fitness and being able to use my experience to help people is truly rewarding and gratifying. Another great advantage of having a voice is that when things spark a passion within me (as almost everything does), I can use my almighty keystrokes to have my fair say and share an opinion. And this is one such instance!
A few weeks ago I wrote a post called Kids and Food: New School Rules in which I discussed how the USDA has finally decided, after 15 years, to provide more universally accepted healthy food choices for children in schools. The changes aren’t perfect, but they’re certainly a step in the right direction.
But not everyone agrees!
Today I read an article in the Chicago Tribune, concerning Elsa Carmona, principal of the Little Village Academy on Chicago’s west side who thinks it’s her job to dictate what her students eat. In a nutshell, home packed lunches are not allowed, and students must eat what’s available in the cafeteria, or go hungry. Unless of course a particular student has an allergy or special needs.
So here’s my take. While I think Carmona’s effort is a noble one, and I’m sure her intentions are true, it’s absolutely misguided. What the hell gives her the right to tell my child what they’re going to eat? It’s one thing for the government and schools to have healthier choices made available, but it’s entirely another issue to tell me what my child must eat, whether they like it or not. In my opinion this is insane and crossing the line. How this has been instituted successfully is beyond me.
Plus, who’s to say what’s healthy and appropriate food? As I’m sure you know there are many different viewpoints on exactly what constitutes a healthy diet. So I’d like to know who came up with this program and who oversees it? It’s also interesting to note that the rule also means the school and the caterer will recieve extra funds. Hmm, sounds a bit shady to me. After all, now kids HAVE to buy lunch, and those that can’t afford it are subsidized by the government (or more accurately by you and I when we pay our taxes).
A spokesperson for the school board states that principal Carbona is encouraging healthier food choices but in my opinion, “encouraging” is the wrong word, and “forcing” fits the bill much better!
As I said in my original post, I believe that teaching children proper behavior, ethics, morality, and how to be healthy is a joint effort between parents and teachers. But in this instance, the principal has overstepped her bounds and taken complete control of her students’ diet while in school. I’m all for children eating better, but not unless I say so and am in agreement. It’s my right as a parent to make decisions for my children and nobody elses, unless my choices or behavior place my child in imminent danger. And even then it’s a case for law enforcement and courts, NOT a school principal.
I’m curious what the teachers eat in their lounge during break. Are any of them smokers, or eat pizza, fried food, or cookies as a snack? One thing I can’t stand is hypocritical behavior, so I’d be interested to know what the principal eats and how her health is. Is she eating any of the bland tasting food that many of the kids throw out, or does she bring a bagged lunch?
I think a better solution would have been to start an “eat healthier” initiative, rather than banning foods. Many communities have had tremendous success with involving parents, children and school staff and entire towns have made huge strides in becoming healthier, while losing many pounds. That’s a smart choice in my opinion. Nobody likes be told what to do, or hearing “you have to”, and in this case I think it’s just a matter of time till this blows up into a big issue. In my experience, when someone is told that can’t have something, especially children, it becomes that much more attractive…
One thing’s for sure, if this were to happen in my children’s school, you can bet your rear end there’d be a whole lotta’ Angry Trainer fury! No one is telling me what my kids have to eat.
But what do you think? Should a principal have the right to demand certain food choices? Or do you think there’s a better way? Start weighing in everyone.
| Print article | This entry was posted by Roger on April 12, 2011 at 5:54 pm, and is filed under NEWS, NUTRITION. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |




































about 1 year ago
I completely agree with you.
When I first read this story, I was stunned. Yes, children do need to eat healthier foods at school and I believe there are parents who needs guidance when it comes to packing a healthy lunch for them.
But seriously? How is this REALLY going to help anyone? By banning bagged lunches completely, it’s a subtle way of saying they (the school) has NO confidence in the parent’s abilities to pack a tasty, nutritious lunch for their child.
And I do agree and wonder on that part abotu teachers and staff. Do THEY eat what’s in the cafeteria? Or do they bring their own lunch? Are THEY all ‘appropriate’ choices? Cause if not, then they are being hypocrites. If the kids have to eat what’s served at the school, then so should they. Not doing so sets a very poor example; it says that, because they’re adults and the one’s in charge, the rules don’t apply to them.
A FAR BETTER method would have been to send a letter to parents expressing concern over food consumption and request that they (parents) involve the children in the preparation of their lunches and the importance of healthy choices and if they needed assistance in making such choices, to seek assistance from the school.
Not only less threatening, but allows the parents to take the time to teach their children better eating habits.
This school? It’s crossing a line.
about 1 year ago
I was a little shocked about what you just wrote here….It’s absolutely insane. You are totally right, nobody should just tell kids what they will eat, and that they are forbidden to bring their own food….For me, it sounds like an episode from the Twilight Zone. Yes, it is most likely to have good results when school and parents work together, and kids are explained, instead of just told how/what they should eat.
In Romania, there is (or was..) a program, called something like “croissant with milk”, and all children from grades 1 to 8 were given each day a croissant (plain, no chocolate or anything) and a yogurt or milk or something like that. The snacks, chips etc. were forbidden to be sold on school grounds (but of course rules are made to be broken). Of course kids are sick and tired of that same food every day at school, and that food goes very often in the stray dogs’ mouths, or the first trash… So, every country has it’s own interpretation of healthy eating, and it seems that when they “plan” something, they forget to think ahead, and don’t see the whole picture (or maybe they just ignore it).
about 1 year ago
I see this from both sides. When I was very young, my parents had no idea how to pack a lunch, and very often the cafeteria food was the healthier choice. But when I was in middle and high school, the quality of the lunches went downhill and I switched to packing my own lunch.
I think the middle road is best. During the school day, teachers and administrators are enabled to act en loco parentis, and I think dictating lunch choices is and should be a part of that. That said, if they allow students to pack lunches based on set guidelines – eg, banning chips or sodas – I think they would be able to cut the best compromise possible.
about 1 year ago
Now this is just crazy. Aside from the fact that they are dictating what a child should eat – who can afford this?? What if there is a percentage of families who simply cannot afford to go buying their child lunch everyday from the cafeteria? I know from the sheer number of breakfast programs in my area (programs that give children a free breakfast because they either cannot afford to eat a healthy breakfast at home, or usually skip breakfast), that there are many families who are in the lower-income bracket.
Anyway, a far better approach is through education and empowerment. Send the kids home with a package, including how to pack healthy lunches, what types of foods to include, etc. Help the parents make the right choices. Granted, some parents won’t care, claim their children are picky eaters, etc… But giving parents an ultimatum like this will solve nothing. People just blow my mind sometimes…